Issue 16

ARCHITECTURE
& FLYING ARE (UN-)RELATED

Matteo Thun

Photos by Matthias Ziegler Words by Oliver Herwig

Matteo Thun is convinced that the world will be changed not by grand gestures, but by the weight of details. A conversation about design.

Do you experience moments of nostalgia?

 

M

T

I have only very occasionally felt I had to turn round and look at where I have come from. The main thing is never to look back with nostalgia; always look forward. That signals optimism about the future, and the belief that tomorrow will be better than today.
-
-
-
-

We’d still like to ask you about the past, though. You studied architecture in Florence and only went to Milan later. What took you to Florence?

 

M

T

I was studying civil engineering, and found it incredibly frustrating because I wanted to be a racing driver. It didn’t work out, but at least I got to drive around the racetrack north of Florence. One Thursday after training I went into the city, happened to park in front of the Architecture Faculty and bumped into Professor Leonardo Savioli. He impressed me so much that I asked him straight away whether I could come and join his course. I promptly moved to Florence and took the leap from engineering to architecture.

-

-

-

-

And your next leap was …

 

M

T

... to Adolfo Natalini, the founder of Superstudio and a superstar himself. He was a proponent of the most radical form of architecture: anti-architecture, the rejection of architecture. Natalini received me and told me there was no point in finishing my studies because there wasn’t a career for me any more; architecture was finished.

-

-

-

-

How did you react?

 

M

T

Well, what was I supposed to do? All I needed was a PhD. Then he told me I would be better off becoming a footballer, but I replied, No, I’m from South Tyrol, and we don’t play football there because the ball always ends up down in the valley.

-

-

-

-

You refused to give up.

 

M

T

No, I told him I was passionate about flying.

-

-

-

-

And what did Adolfo Natalini say to that?

 

M

T

He advised me to build an airfoil and demonstrate that it worked. Like Leonardo da Vinci 500 years earlier, when he wrote that his flying machine would cast a shadow over the towers of Florence. So I hung my airfoil up in the university auditorium to a soundtrack of Pink Floyd, and was certain I would be thrown out.

-

-

-

-

You played The Dark Side of the Moon as a provocation?

 

M

T

Yes. The jury, made up of a single engineer amid a crowd of architects, said OK, that’s it, enough.

-

-

-

-

But you still completed your studies with the highest possible mark.

 

M

T

Yes, 110. The highest a doctorate could go. My saviour was Giovanni Klaus Koenig, an engineer who became famous as a designer of rail and light rail vehicles for Milan. He knew how much time and effort I had spent on my airfoil in the wind tunnel, trying to find the right angle that would enable the thing to fly. All that work was captured in a film clip, a pretty bad Super 8 film. Koenig won the jury over in half an hour and told them, Don’t throw him out, give him a summa cum laude! But the result was still a disaster.

-

-

-

-

Why a disaster?

 

M

T

Nobody wanted me as an architect, because I didn’t know anything. When people asked me what I could do, I said, Well, I can fly. But architecture and flying are fairly unrelated.

-

-

-

-

Did you take your provocative design potential along with you to Memphis?

 

M

T

I ran into Ettore Sottsass completely by chance in Los Angeles, and he said, Come and visit me when you’re in Milan. So I did.

-

-

-

-

How did you see Memphis?

 

M

T

Memphis was a gymnastic exercise at the outer limits of feasibility.

-

-

-

-

And why did it chime with you?

 

M

T

It chimed with me because the Bauhaus was too grey.

-

-

-

-

Please select an offer and read the Complete Article Issue No 16 Subscriptions